Today I read a fascinating essay in Nature written by indigenous authors primarily in Australia and New Zealand about decolonizing conservation science. It has given me pause to consider how this point of view can be leveraged with a grant from the BioPark Conservation Committee. The essay highlighted eight areas where concrete steps can be taken.
Recognize science’s colonial legacy—ensure that students learn the history of their field
Fund—increasing Indigenous representation on decision-making panels
Hire, retain, promote—bring Indigenous scholars together, such as through mentoring networks, and to ensure that Indigenous faculty members have time to build relationships with local Indigenous Peoples
Dismantle institutional racism—facilitate connections, collaborations and mentorships among Indigenous academics
Recognize indigenous knowledge—engage with the Indigenous communities who steward such knowledge, with their full consent
Create safe spaces in science—Traditional Ecological Knowledge section in the Ecological Society of America; the Indigenous Action Taskforce in the American Geophysical Union
Foster Indigenous sovereignty—including Indigenous community members and researchers early on in research projects can ensure that they are designed, implemented and reported with Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and well-being in mind
Move towards Land Back—free BioPark membership; research opportunities; direct research programs to serve Indigenous communities
Of course, these days are perilous times to even mention diversity, equity, and inclusion. That's a red flag for defunding, at the very least.
More references and resources:
Indigenous knowledge is key to sustainable food systems--https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00021-4
NSF invests millions to unite Indigenous knowledge with Western science--https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02839-4
Weaving Indigenous knowledge into the scientific method--https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00029-2
Travel Schlepp, just for the heck of it |